Conjunctivitis
|
Causal agent |
Unknown. Probably a
combination of Bordetella
bronchiseptica and Chlamydia
psittici. |
||
|
Age group |
Weaners and progresses into grow/finish and young adults |
||
Clinical
signs
|
|||
|
Sneezing and runny eyes in the late farrowing house and
nursery. |
|||
|
Conjunctiva of both eyes become injected and inflamed |
|||
|
Third eyelid prolapses. Once prolapsed condition seems to become
static. |
|||
|
Many only affect individuals, but on some farms all pigs
in the pen are affected. |
|||
|
The pigs otherwise do not seem affected by the condition |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Growing
pigs with conjunctivitis |
Both eyes are equally affected |
Detail of conjunctivitis with prolapse of the third
eyelid |
|
|
Infectivity |
|||
|
Unknown |
|||
Transmission
|
|||
|
Probable nose to nose contact. Organisms isolated are very common on all
farms with or without the problem |
|||
|
Post-mortem lesions |
|||
|
Severe conjunctivitis with prolapse of the third eyelid. |
|||
|
Sclera and cornea unaffected |
|||
|
Tear staining on face. |
|||
|
Young pigs moderate to severe purulent rhinitis |
|||
|
Diagnosis |
|||
|
Clinical signs |
|||
|
Chlamydia suspected as a secondary invader following
swollen exposed conjunctiva |
|||
|
Treatment |
|||
|
Individual/group |
Review Progressive atrophic rhinitis vaccine programme. |
||
|
Test and eliminate toxigenic Pasteurella multocida as a problem |
|||
|
Antimicrobials appear to have little effect. Overuse of antimicrobials may encourage
Chamydia as a problem |
|||
|
Control |
Review management of the farm buildings |
||
|
Avoid chilling and draughts |
|||
|
Reduce ammonia concentrations in the air |
|||
|
Reduce dust levels in the grower and finishing house –
cover feeders, consider wet feeding |
|||
|
Minimise the clinical effects of PRRSv |
|||
|
Common differentials |
|||
|
Progressive Atrophic Rhinitis. Swine Influenza |
|||
|
Zoonotic
Implications |
|||
|
Some of the potential pathogens are
zoonotic agents – Chlamydia for example. |
|||